Response: Which prospective data might possibly be fascinating, for sure, not in regards to our research matter. Whether your reviewer considers that our analyses aren’t suitable for address all of our research concern (to not other possibly interesting search inquiries), we wish to look for an obvious description of those proposed analyses and you may a justification in their eyes. As the newest reviewer has not warranted this time and also merely demonstrated exactly what he/she’d want to see or will have carried out by themselves/herself, we have found you don’t need to do that. What it is your manuscript are clear; not specifically ambitious, however, obvious: to compare profiles and you may nonusers in mating orientations. The fresh proposed data isn’t the one to wanted to try to offer a means to fix all of our research matter.
Out of a statistical viewpoint, this has been recognized for for years and years one to dichotomizing parameters is not an effective habit (Cohen, 1983).
The latest SOI-R performed declaration differences between men and women (expected). Yet about demonstrated regression (desk dos) the bookofsex-coupon results try unanticipated toward Penke & Asendorpf (2008, p. 14). How come? Why does so it look-in the complete design?
Response: Again, i’ve had trouble to completely comprehend the feedback. Hence, we really do not create one transform regarding this problem.
e.grams. 222-229: The dialogue and the principle try speaing frankly about the brand new intentions out of profiles. Yet , zero motives is actually assessed, but attitudes. The link between both was missing on article, excite bring certain subsequent literary works otherwise concentrate on perceptions.
Response: I feel dissapointed about to not getting agreed upon this point. Given this doing state, we learn if discover variations in mating orientations (short-identity, long-term) depending on even in the event you’re a user of matchmaking programs. All of our method was considering earlier in the day browse performed on this subject topic and you can, before best of all of our knowledge, there’s absolutely no option means out-of this dilemma who’s got exhibited to be a lot better than the present one. For this reason, we do not would alterations in the latest manuscript in respect that have so you’re able to this remark.
Severe: The brand new source of single students is missing ahead of (identity or at least in the 1st half the brand new abstract).
Right from the start of the manuscript, i talk about the reasons for the use of relationships programs and one, despite the established label, you can use them to own numerous types of factors, not merely with the search for relaxed sex
Response: Many thanks a whole lot for it remark. Following the your testimonial, you will find integrated this problem in the 1st 50 % of the new abstract (p. 2, line 28): “Users was in fact 902 unmarried youngsters off a middle-proportions Foreign language college…”. Besides that, throughout the Users and you will Processes point, i stated: “This study are element of more substantial project done in an excellent Foreign-language university that lined up to explore multiple regions of brand new sex regarding young pupils” (now, inside the p. six, contours 142-143). Furthermore, i said “the author?s college or university” (p. seven, line 170), which issue is talked about in study’s limits (now, in the p. fifteen, contours 336-340).
235: «Conclusions». Because correlations is actually displayed and theory checked-out from inside the a cross-sectional studies, the wording could be picked even more thoughtful.
Response: I have carefully checked this part and we have not been able to find people causal allege. We have made an effort to define the overall performance given that ‘differences’, ‘correlations’ otherwise ‘associations’. But if we missed people causal allege, we shall switch it.
The effective use of relationship software is actually analyzed in the place of delving toward kind of uses, out of individuals who tried it on a single afternoon once the an effective joke one of family members to those whom used it having months looking to have a romantic relationship
Response: Thank you for your own testimonial. We now have integrated additional information about Restrictions area, to include all the factors mentioned by reviewers (now in the pp. 15-sixteen, contours 341-365):
The research enjoys a lot of limits. Almost every other constraints were connected with the latest representativeness of the sample and you will the new generalization of the abilities. Among the latest people, the decide to try is actually mostly women, old between 18 and you can twenty-six, single and you may from 1 college, putting some abilities hard to generalize to university students and you will, nonetheless reduced to help you young low-students.